The Telecommunications Packaging Market: A Strategic Analysis of Advanced Technologies, Sustainability Shifts, and Growth Opportunities (2025-2035)

The Telecommunications Packaging Market: A Strategic Analysis of Advanced Technologies, Sustainability Shifts, and Growth Opportunities (2025-2035)

Executive Summary

The packaging market serving the telecommunications industry is in a period of robust transformation, driven by the relentless growth in data consumption, the global rollout of 5G infrastructure, and the increasing complexity of semiconductor components. Key takeaways for strategists and investors are:

  1. Strong Market Growth: The core semiconductor assembly and packaging services market, a critical supplier to telecom, is projected to grow from $71.67 billion in 2024 to $94.12 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 4.0% . Adjacent markets like electronic packaging materials also show steady expansion.
  2. Technology Transition is Critical: A major shift is underway in packaging platforms for key components like application processors (APUs). While Package-on-Package (PoP) dominates today, Fan-Out (e.g., TSMC’s InFO-PoP) and panel-level packaging are rapidly gaining share, driven by demands for higher I/O density, better thermal performance, and thinner profiles .
  3. Sustainability as a Regulatory and Competitive Frontier: New global legislation, such as the EU’s Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), is mandating the use of recycled content and dictating design principles. This is forcing innovation in sustainable packaging solutions across the value chain, from device shipping materials to semiconductor substrate materials .
  4. Material Innovation Drives Performance: Advanced materials, including specialized ceramics, plastics, and metals for electronic packaging, are essential for managing heat and signal integrity in 5G and future networks. The performance of telecommunications infrastructure and devices is increasingly limited by packaging and materials, not just silicon .
  5. A Consolidated yet Innovative Competitive Landscape: The market is led by a few large players like ASE, Amkor, and TSMC in OSAT/Foundry, and Ibiden and Shinko in substrates. However, disruptive opportunities exist for companies specializing in advanced technologies like Fan-Out PLP, chiplet integration, and sustainable material solutions .

I. Industry Overview and Definition

1.1. Core Definition, Scope, and Segmentation

Packaging for telecommunications encompasses the design, materials, and technologies used to protect, interconnect, power, and cool the semiconductor devices and electronic systems that form the backbone of telecom networks and consumer devices. It is a critical enabling technology without which modern communication is impossible. This market is segmented by several key dimensions:

  • By Product Type:
    • Semiconductor Assembly & Packaging Services: This includes the core back-end services provided by OSATs (Outsourced Semiconductor Assembly and Test) and IDMs (Integrated Device Manufacturers). It is further segmented into Assembly Services and Packaging Services .
    • Packaging Substrates: The foundational layers that provide electrical interconnection and mechanical support for the semiconductor die. Key types for mobile devices include FC-CSP, WBCSP, SiP, and FC-BGA .
    • Electronic Packaging Materials: The raw materials used for encapsulation and protection, including Metal Packaging, Plastic Packaging, and Ceramic Packaging, each offering distinct thermal, electrical, and cost profiles .
  • By Application:
    • Telecom Infrastructure: 5G/6G base stations, core network equipment, and data centers.
    • Consumer Devices: Smartphones, tablets, and IoT modules, which are the primary end-points of telecom networks.
    • Other Key Sectors: The technologies also cross-over into Automotive (connected cars), Aerospace & Defense, and Medical Devices .
  • By Level of Packaging:
    • Device-level packaging (e.g., a single chip).
    • Board-level packaging (e.g., a printed circuit board assembly).
    • System-level packaging (e.g., a complete module or device enclosure).

1.2. Historical Trajectory and Major Milestones

The evolution of telecom packaging has been driven by Moore’s Law and the demand for smaller, faster, and more power-efficient devices. The journey began with simple through-hole and surface-mount packages, evolving into advanced flip-chip and Ball Grid Array (BGA) packages that offered higher pin counts and better performance. The introduction of Package-on-Package (PoP) in the mid-2000s was a landmark, allowing for the vertical stacking of logic and memory chips, drastically saving space in smartphones . The 2010s saw the rise of Fan-Out Wafer-Level Packaging (FOWLP), pioneered by TSMC for Apple’s A-series processors, enabling even thinner profiles and superior electrical performance. We are now entering the era of 3D integration, panel-level packaging, and chiplets, which are essential for continuing performance scaling as traditional transistor shrinkage becomes more difficult and expensive .

1.3. Value Chain Analysis

The value chain for telecom packaging is complex and globally distributed:

  • Upstream: Includes raw material suppliers providing specialty chemicals, polymers, ceramics, metal alloys, and silicon wafers. Key players include DuPont, Evonik, and Sumitomo Chemical .
  • Midstream: Comprises the core packaging manufacturers. This segment is divided into:
    • OSATs: Specialized providers like Advanced Semiconductor Engineering (ASE) and Amkor Technology .
    • IDMs: Companies like Intel and Samsung that design, manufacture, and package their own chips .
    • Foundries: Companies like TSMC that are increasingly integrating advanced packaging (e.g., InFO, CoWoS) as a core part of their manufacturing offering .
    • Substrate Manufacturers: Specialists like Ibiden, Shinko Electric Industries, and Samsung Electro-Mechanics .
  • Downstream: Includes the original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) that integrate packaged semiconductors into final products (e.g., smartphone brands like Apple and Google, and network equipment providers like Ericsson and Huawei) .

II. Market Size and Dynamics

2.1. Current Global Market Size and Regional Breakdown

The global market for semiconductor assembly and packaging services, a direct proxy for the core telecom packaging market, was valued at approximately $71.67 billion in 2024 . When including the broader electronic packaging materials market, which was $5.79 billion in 2024, the total addressable market is substantial .
Regionally, the Asia-Pacific region dominates, accounting for the largest share of both manufacturing and consumption, driven by the presence of major OSATs, foundries, and consumer electronics OEMs in Taiwan, South Korea, China, and Japan . North America remains a key hub for R&D and design, housing leaders like Intel and AMD, while Europe holds strengths in specific automotive and industrial semiconductor applications.

2.2. Market Growth Drivers

  • Macroeconomic: Proliferation of 5G and IoT: The global deployment of 5G networks requires massive infrastructure upgrades, including new base stations with advanced RF components and network processors, all requiring sophisticated packaging. The growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) is connecting billions of new devices, fueling demand for low-power, reliable packaging solutions .
  • Technological: Device Miniaturization and Performance Demands: Consumer demand for thinner, lighter, and more powerful smartphones and wearables is a relentless driver. Advanced packaging technologies like Fan-Out and 3D stacking are the primary enablers of this trend, as they allow for greater functional integration in a smaller footprint .
  • Behavioral: Surge in Data Consumption and AI: The exponential growth in video streaming, cloud gaming, and AI-driven applications at the edge is pushing the performance limits of data centers and end-user devices. This necessitates packaging that can handle higher data rates, manage immense heat loads, and integrate heterogeneous components like CPUs, GPUs, and memory efficiently.

2.3. Key Market Restraints and Challenges

  • Technical Complexity and Cost: As packaging technologies advance, the required R&D investment and capital expenditure for new fabrication facilities skyrocket. The shift to 2nm and below processes exacerbates issues like wafer warpage, requiring more expensive materials and process controls .
  • Thermal Management: The concentration of power in increasingly small spaces creates intense heat fluxes. Dissipating this heat is a primary challenge, as excessive temperatures degrade performance and reliability. This is particularly acute in PoP structures where the DRAM sits directly on top of the heat-generating APU .
  • Supply Chain Fragility and Geopolitics: The industry’s concentration in specific geographic regions makes it vulnerable to disruptions, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic and trade tensions. Export controls and national security policies can restrict the flow of advanced packaging technologies and materials .
  • Stringent Environmental Regulations: Complying with a growing patchwork of global sustainability regulations, such as the EU’s PPWR, requires significant investment in new materials, processes, and data management systems to track and report on recyclability and carbon footprint .

2.4. 5-Year Market Forecast

The semiconductor assembly and packaging services market is projected to reach $94.12 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 4.0% from 2025 to 2031 . The electronic packaging materials market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 2.8% over the same period, reaching $7.01 billion by 2031 . However, specific advanced packaging segments, particularly those enabling 5G and AI, are expected to grow at a significantly faster rate. For instance, the broader electronic packaging market is projected by some analysts to achieve a remarkable CAGR of 17.8% from 2025 to 2031, highlighting the hyper-growth within innovative sub-segments .
Rationale: This growth will be fueled by the continued build-out of 5G infrastructure, the commercial launch of 6G research platforms, the adoption of advanced packaging in high-performance computing for AI, and the increasing penetration of advanced packaging technologies like Fan-Out and SiP in mid-range smartphones.

III. Competitive Landscape Analysis

3.1. Market Share Analysis of Top 5 Players

The global semiconductor assembly and packaging market is moderately concentrated. The leading players, based on revenue and capacity, include:

  1. Advanced Semiconductor Engineering (ASE): The world’s largest OSAT, with a significant market share in a wide range of packaging technologies .
  2. Amkor Technology: A major global OSAT with strong relationships with leading fabless semiconductor companies and IDMs .
  3. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC): While primarily a foundry, TSMC has become a dominant force in advanced packaging through its proprietary InFO (Integrated Fan-Out) and CoWoS (Chip-on-Wafer-on-Substrate) technologies, which are critical for leading-edge smartphones and AI chips .
  4. Intel: This IDM is a leader in packaging R&D, pioneering technologies such as Foveros (3D packaging) and EMIB (Embedded Multi-die Interconnect Bridge) .
  5. Samsung Electronics: Another leading IDM and foundry, Samsung is aggressively developing its advanced packaging capabilities, including I-Cube and H-Cube, to compete with TSMC for high-performance computing clients .

In the specialized substrate market, the leaders include Ibiden, Shinko Electric Industries, and Samsung Electro-Mechanics .

3.2. Detailed SWOT Analysis for Two Dominant Leaders

Company: Advanced Semiconductor Engineering (ASE)

  • Strengths: Unmatched global scale and production capacity; broad portfolio covering both mature and advanced packaging; strong financial stability; deep, long-standing client relationships.
  • Weaknesses: Potentially slower adoption of the most cutting-edge, proprietary technologies compared to leading foundries; margin pressure from the highly competitive mainstream packaging business.
  • Opportunities: Leading the charge in panel-level fan-out packaging (FO-PLP) to reduce costs ; capitalizing on the growing demand for SiP for IoT and automotive applications; benefiting from industry consolidation.
  • Threats: Intense price competition from other OSATs; the vertical integration of foundries (TSMC, Samsung) into advanced packaging; vulnerability to economic downturns that affect consumer electronics demand.

Company: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)

  • Strengths: Unparalleled technology leadership in advanced nodes and packaging; tight co-optimization of process technology and packaging (e.g., InFO for 5nm/3nm); captive demand from the world’s leading fabless companies (Apple, AMD, NVIDIA); high-profit margins.
  • Weaknesses: Very high capital expenditure requirements; business is concentrated on a few, very large customers; capacity constraints can limit ability to serve the broader market.
  • Opportunities: Monetizing advanced packaging as a key differentiator and value-driver beyond pure silicon fabrication; leading the industry transition to 3D chiplet-based systems; setting the de facto standards for next-generation packaging.
  • Threats: Geopolitical risks related to the concentration of its manufacturing in Taiwan; antitrust scrutiny; the risk of customers developing in-house packaging capabilities or diversifying to competitors like Samsung.

3.3. Emerging and Disruptive Competitors

The landscape is being reshaped by several trends:

  • Foundry Encroachment: The most significant disruption comes from TSMC and Samsung, who are making advanced packaging a core part of their foundry offering, potentially disintermediating OSATs for the most premium chips .
  • Specialized Technology Startups: Companies focusing on specific innovative processes, such as nepes in panel-level packaging, are gaining traction and attracting investment .
  • Material Science Innovators: Companies like Tanaka and Mitsui High-tec are developing new metal alloys, ceramic substrates, and molding compounds that enable next-generation packaging performance, giving them significant influence in the value chain .

IV. Technology and Innovation

4.1. Key Enabling Technologies and Their Impact

  • Fan-Out Wafer-Level Packaging (FOWLP): This technology redistributes I/O connections across the surface of the molded reconstituted wafer, allowing for a higher I/O density in a smaller, thinner package without the need for a bulky substrate. It is rapidly becoming the preferred solution for high-end smartphone application processors. TSMC’s InFO-PoP is a direct variant that enables memory stacking on top .
  • Panel-Level Packaging (PLP): An evolution of FOWLP, PLP uses large, rectangular panels instead of round wafers, promising significant cost reduction and higher unit output. Major OSATs like Amkor and ASE are actively pushing FO-PLP toward high-volume manufacturing .
  • 2.5D/3D Integrated Circuit Packaging: These technologies involve stacking multiple chips vertically (3D) or placing them side-by-side on a silicon interposer (2.5D) to achieve massive bandwidth and performance gains. TSMC’s CoWoS and Intel’s Foveros are key examples, and they are critical for AI accelerators and high-performance network chips.
  • System-in-Package (SiP): SiP integrates multiple heterogeneous chips (e.g., processor, memory, RF transceiver, sensors) into a single package, creating a functional subsystem. This is essential for compact and highly integrated devices like smartphones and wearables .
  • Molded-Core Embedded Package (MCeP): Developed by Shinko, MCeP uses copper-core solder balls and molding resin to control warpage and layer spacing in PoP structures precisely, allowing for the use of thinner substrates. It has been widely adopted by Android smartphone makers .

Table: Comparison of Key Advanced Packaging Technologies for Telecommunications

TechnologyDescriptionKey AdvantageTelecom Application
FC-BGA / FC-CSP PoPTraditional flip-chip on substrate with package-on-package stacking.Well-established, reliable.Mid-range smartphones, baseband processors .
MCePPoP with copper-core balls and mold for structural rigidity.Excellent warpage control, allows for thinner packages.High-performance Android smartphones .
Fan-Out / InFO-PoPUses RDL layers for interconnect, replacing substrate.Thinner profile, superior electrical/thermal performance.Flagship smartphones (Apple, transitioning Android) .
2.5D/3D ICStacking dies on a silicon interposer or directly.Extremely high bandwidth and integration.Network switches, AI/ML accelerators in data centers.
SiPIntegrates multiple different chips in one package.Functional integration, reduces board space.RF Front-end Modules (FEM), connectivity modules .

4.2. R&D Investment Trends and Patent Landscape

R&D investment is heavily concentrated in several key areas:

  • Thermal Interface Materials (TIMs) and Thermal Management: With power densities climbing, R&D is focused on developing high-thermal-conductivity pastes, gels, and interface materials to efficiently move heat away from the die .
  • Low-Loss Substrate Materials: For 5G mmWave applications, signal loss in the substrate is a critical issue. R&D is targeting new laminate materials and glass substrates that offer superior high-frequency performance.
  • Advanced RDL Processes: The ability to create finer line widths and spaces in the Redistribution Layers (RDLs) is key to Fan-Out and panel-level packaging. R&D focuses on lithography and plating techniques to enable this.
  • Chiplet Integration and Standards: The industry is investing heavily in Universal Chiplet Interconnect Express (UCIe) and other standards to enable a “Lego-like” approach to building SoCs from chiplets, with advanced packaging providing the interconnect fabric. The economic window for chiplets in smartphones is expected to open around 2027-2028 .
    The patent landscape is intensely competitive, with TSMC, Samsung, Intel, and ASE holding large portfolios covering specific structures, materials, and process techniques related to the technologies above.

4.3. Future Technology Roadmaps

The technology roadmap is converging on several key themes:

  • AI Integration in Packaging Design and Manufacturing: AI and machine learning will be used to optimize package design for signal integrity, power integrity, and thermal performance. AI will also be deployed on the production floor for predictive maintenance and real-time process control to improve yield.
  • Ubiquitous IoT and Sensor Integration: Packaging will evolve to natively incorporate sensors for monitoring the health of the package itself (e.g., stress, temperature) and the surrounding environment, enabling predictive maintenance for critical network infrastructure .
  • Heterogeneous Integration with Photonics: The ultimate convergence for data centers will be the integration of silicon photonics engines with compute dies in a single package, using light instead of electrons for ultra-high-speed, low-power interconnects over longer distances.
  • Sustainability-Driven Innovation: The roadmap will increasingly be influenced by the need for “green packaging,” driving R&D into lead-free and halogen-free materials, bio-based polymers, and designs for disassembly and recycling .

V. Regulatory and Policy Environment

5.1. Major Governing Bodies and Key Regulations

  • International Organizations: Bodies like JEDEC and IPC set the technical standards for package outlines, materials, and reliability testing that ensure interoperability across the global supply chain.
  • Regional Environmental Regulators:
    • European Union: The Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) is the most impactful legislation, setting mandatory recycled content targets (e.g., 35% in plastic packaging by 2030) and dictating design-for-recycling rules. The Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) directive also limits the use of specific materials .
    • United States: Regulations like California’s SB 54 mandate ambitious recycling and source reduction targets, pushing companies to secure verifiable supply chains for recycled content .
    • China: The country’s dual-carbon goals (peak carbon by 2030, carbon neutrality by 2060) are driving national and provincial policies that encourage or mandate the use of sustainable packaging.

5.2. Geopolitical and Trade Policy Impact

Geopolitics is a defining feature of the semiconductor packaging landscape. Export controls on advanced semiconductor technology, particularly between the US and China, have created a bifurcated supply chain. This forces companies to develop separate technology roadmaps and manufacturing footprints for different markets, increasing costs and complexity. The CHIPS Act in the US and similar initiatives in the EU and Japan are providing subsidies to attract advanced packaging manufacturing onshore, aiming to de-risk the geographic concentration of supply in Asia.

5.3. Ethical and Sustainability Considerations

Beyond compliance, there is a growing ethical imperative for sustainable operations.

  • E-Waste Management: Telecommunications devices contribute significantly to global e-waste. Packaging that is easier to disassemble, uses fewer material types, and employs readily recyclable or biodegradable materials is becoming a brand differentiator.
  • Carbon Footprint and Greenwashing: Companies are under pressure from investors and consumers to accurately measure and transparently report the carbon footprint of their products, including the packaging. Unsubstantiated “green” claims (greenwashing) carry significant reputational and legal risks .
  • Conflict Minerals: Adherence to regulations like the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act’s conflict minerals rule is a baseline requirement, ensuring that materials like tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold are sourced responsibly.

VI. Financial and Investment Analysis

6.1. Industry Valuation Multiples

While specific multiples vary based on company type (OSAT vs. Foundry vs. IDM) and market conditions, illustrative averages can be derived from industry benchmarks:

  • Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio: OSATs typically trade at a moderate P/E range, often between 12x and 18x trailing earnings, reflecting their role as cyclical, capital-intensive manufacturers. Foundries and IDMs with leading-edge packaging capabilities (e.g., TSMC) command premium multiples, often in the 20x-30x range, due to their higher growth profile and pricing power.
  • EV/EBITDA Multiple: This multiple is commonly used for capital-intensive businesses. OSATs might trade in a range of 6x to 9x EV/EBITDA, while technology leaders can command 10x to 15x or higher.
  • Price-to-Sales (P/S) Ratio: This can range from 1x to 2x for mature OSAT businesses to 5x to 10x for high-growth companies focused on advanced packaging and chiplets.

6.2. Recent Mergers, Acquisitions, and Funding Activities

The industry has seen consolidation as players seek to gain scale, geographic reach, and technological capabilities. While the provided search results do not list specific recent M&A deals, the historical trend has included OSATs acquiring smaller rivals. Venture capital and private equity funding is increasingly flowing into startups focused on:

  • Advanced Packaging Equipment: Tools for panel-level processing, hybrid bonding, and advanced lithography.
  • Material Science: Companies developing novel thermal management materials, low-loss dielectrics, and sustainable alternatives to traditional packaging plastics and ceramics.
  • Design Software and AI: EDA companies creating new tools specifically for 2.5D/3D and heterogeneous integration design.

6.3. Analysis of Profit Margins and Cost Structures

  • Profit Margins: Profitability is highly tiered. Providers of standard, commoditized packaging services operate on thin gross margins, often in the 15%-25% range. In contrast, companies with proprietary advanced packaging technologies (e.g., TSMC’s CoWoS) can achieve gross margins of 50% or higher.
  • Cost Structure:
    • Raw Materials (COGS): Substrates, leadframes, molding compounds, and gold wires constitute a significant portion of the cost of goods sold.
    • Depreciation: High capital expenditure for cleanrooms and advanced tooling (e.g., lithography scanners, plating tools, bonders) leads to substantial depreciation charges.
    • R&D Expenditure: Leading players invest 8-15% of their revenue back into R&D to stay at the forefront of technology.
    • Labor: While automation is high, labor remains a meaningful cost, particularly in regions with higher wage structures.

VII. Strategic Recommendations and Outlook

7.1. Strategic Recommendations for Existing Practitioners

  • Differentiate through Technology Specialization: Avoid the brutal competition in legacy packaging by developing deep expertise in one or two high-growth advanced technologies, such as Fan-Out PLP or silicon photonics integration.
  • Forge Strategic Partnerships: OSATs should strengthen partnerships with foundries, EDA companies, and material suppliers to co-develop integrated solutions. Material suppliers should engage in joint development agreements (JDAs) with major OSATs and IDMs.
  • Implement “Design-for-Sustainability”: Integrate sustainability considerations from the earliest stages of packaging design. Invest in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tools and secure supply chains for certified recycled materials to ensure compliance and market access .
  • Optimize the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO): For packaging buyers (OEMs), the selection criterion should shift from unit price to TCO, which includes performance, yield, reliability, and the cost of system-level integration.

7.2. Investment Thesis and Risk Assessment for New Investors

  • Investment Thesis: The most compelling investment opportunities lie in companies and technologies that are enablers of the major industry shifts: Advanced Packaging Equipment (for 3D and PLP), Specialty Materials (for thermal management and high-frequency), Chiplet IP and Interface Technologies, and Software for Heterogeneous Integration Design.
  • Risk Assessment:
    • High Capital Intensity: The sector requires continuous heavy investment, which can strain cash flow and lead to poor returns if technology cycles are misjudged.
    • Cyclicality: The semiconductor industry is inherently cyclical. A downturn in consumer electronics or telecom capex can lead to rapid declines in demand and utilization rates for packaging services.
    • Execution Risk: Successfully scaling new technologies like PLP from R&D to high-volume manufacturing is fraught with technical challenges and delays .
    • Geopolitical Risk: Policy shifts can instantly alter market access and supply chains, making geopolitical hedging a necessary cost of doing business.

7.3. Long-Term Industry Outlook (10-Year Vision)

By 2035, the packaging for the telecommunications industry will be virtually unrecognizable from today’s state. We envision:

  • The Rise of the “Package-as-a-Platform”: The package will no longer be a passive container but an active platform, integrating chiplets from different process nodes, photonic engines, and embedded power delivery and cooling solutions.
  • Ubiquitous AI and Functional Integration: AI accelerators will be a standard component integrated into network processor packages for real-time optimization and security. Antennas and passive components will be embedded directly into the package substrate.
  • A Circular Economy Model: Driven by stringent regulations and full cost internalization of carbon, the industry will shift to a circular model. This will feature widespread use of bio-based and recycled materials, standardized designs for easy disassembly, and sophisticated reverse logistics for reusing and recycling high-value semiconductor components.
  • Packaging for Terahertz Communications (6G): The advent of 6G will push operating frequencies into the terahertz range, requiring entirely new packaging and material paradigms to manage unprecedented signal loss and heat generation, potentially leveraging metamaterials and advanced ceramics.

References

  1. 《逆袭增长的半导体装配和包装服务行业：市场规模狂揽7432百万美元，还在递增！》 – 环洋市场咨询 (Global Info Research), 2025.
  2. 《2025年全球包装基板在移动设备领域的运用行业总体规模、主要企业国内外市场占有率及排名》 – QYResearch, 2025.
  3. 《智能手机应用处理器封装的下一站：从PoP到Fan-Out与面板级封装》 – EEPW, 2025.
  4. 《2024-2026年电话包装行业投资分析及前景预测报告》 – 中国产业竞争情报网.
  5. 《Converging Trends to Reshape the Future of Packaging》 – Gartner, 2025.
  6. 《2025-2027年中国电话包装行业投资前景及策略咨询报告》 – 中国产业发展研究网.
  7. 《2025-2031全球与中国电子包装材料市场现状及未来发展趋势》 – QYResearch, 2025.
  8. 《中国电话包装市场现状分析及前景预测报告》 – 中国产业发展研究网.
  9. 《2031年电子封装市场份额、范围和增长分析》 – The Insight Partners, 2025.
  10. 《2025有实力的蜂窝包装纸缓冲包装品牌十：BioAir降解膜纵封强度≥30N，运输不爆边》 – 德州日报, 2025.
Previous Article
Next Article